Gambling Crimes Work With One of the Nation's Most Experienced & Successful Trial Lawyers

Boston Gambling Crimes Lawyer

Massachusetts Gambling Laws

While gambling is legal under certain circumstances, there are federal laws that prohibit some acts. These statutes are varied and complex, and you might find yourself being investigated for or accused of an offense for engaging in specific behaviors. If you're convicted, you could face prison time and fines. The best way to fight your charges is to seek skilled legal representation immediately. The sooner you contact a lawyer, the sooner they can begin building your defense.

At Martin G. Weinberg, Attorney at Law, our lawyer has over 40 years of legal experience and knows what it takes to effectively handle cases of varying complexities. We will examine every detail of your situation to identify weaknesses in the prosecutor's allegations and seek ways to cast reasonable doubt on the accusations made against you.

We're here to discuss your case and work toward a favorable outcome on your behalf. Schedule your consultation by calling us at (617) 227-3700 today.

United States Gambling Statutes

If you're facing a serious federal gambling charge, speak with our Boston attorney to learn more about the offense and your legal options. We are committed to providing focused and fierce representation, and we will explore every legal avenue to protect your rights and freedoms.

Generally, a gambling (or gaming) offense involves engaging in unlawful betting or wagering. Under federal law, different types of conduct could be considered gambling crimes:

  • 18 U.S. Code § 1082 - This law makes it illegal for a U.S. citizen or resident, or any person on an American ship or airplane, to operate a gambling ship or an establishment on the vessel. A conviction could result in a fine and/or up to 2 years in prison.
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1083 - Under this federal law, a person is prohibited from transporting passengers from anywhere in the U.S. to a gambling ship.
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1084 - This law prohibits the use of a wire communication facility for transmitting bets or wagers on sporting events. If the accused is found guilty, they could be imprisoned for up to 2 years and/or fined.
  • 28 U.S. Code § 3702 - It is unlawful for a government entity or person to operate, promote, or sponsor betting or gambling on professional or amateur sports competitions.
  • 31 U.S. Code § 5363 - Under this law, a person is prohibited from knowingly accepting or transmitting funds over the Internet for unlawful gambling purposes.

Regardless of the gambling crime charge you're facing, we're ready to help. Call us at (617) 227-3700 or contact us online.

  • The Best Lawyers in America
  • Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register of Pre-eminent Lawyers
  • Lawyers Assistance Strike Force
  • United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • Guest lecturer at Harvard Law School
  • Best Law Firms for Criminal Defense: White-Collar in Boston, MA
  • Top 10 Attorneys in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • AV Preeminent® Rating from Martindale-Hubbell®
  • Super Lawyers®

Highly Revered & Recommended

  • “One of the deans of the criminal defense bar!”

    - David O. Markus
  • “Among the nation’s best defense lawyers.”

    - Miami Herald
  • “A nationally prominent criminal defense lawyer.”

    - Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Contact Us Today

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.

Significant Cases

  • Successful Challenge US v Warshak

    631 F3d 266 CA 6 (2010): Successful challenge to the Department of Justice’s reliance on the Stored Communications Act to seize the content of emails in violation of the Fourth Amendment

  • Reversal of Conviction US v Bravo Fernandez

    (722 F3d 1, 1st Cir, 2013): Federal Court of Appeals reversed conviction of a leading businessman in Puerto Rico for federal programs bribery holding that gratuities cannot, legally, be the basis for such a conviction.

  • Vacated Sanction US v Agosto-Vega

    (1st Cir, 9-27-13): Federal Court of Appeals vacated a monetary sanction imposed against a criminal defense attorney holding that there was no legal or factual basis for the imposition of the sanction.

  • Vacated Conviction US v Urciuoli

    513 F3d 290 CA 1 (2008): Vacating of honest services conviction as a result of instructions that impermissibly broadened the “official act” element of 18 USC 1346.

  • New Trial Motion US v Carpenter
  • Habeas Corpus Relief Ferrara v US

    456 F3d 278 CA 1 (2006): Affirming trial court’s granting of habeas corpus relief to a RICO defendant whose decision to plead guilty to murder predicates was found to be involuntary due to prosecutor’s concealment of core exculpatory evidence.

  • Appeal of Conviction US v Stewart

    433 F3d 273 CA 2 (2006): Co-counsel in appeal of conviction of Martha Stewart for making false statements and obstructing an SEC investigation.

  • Reversal of Conviction US v Carucci

    364 F3d 339 CA 1 (2004): Reversal of money laundering convictions following split jury verdict in prosecution of Boston real estate developer

  • Non-Contempt US v Kouri-Perez

    187 F3d 1 CA 1 (1999): Representation of attorneys charged with non-contempt civil sanctions.

  • Vacated Sentence US v Grandmaison