Internet & Computer Crimes Work With One of the Nation's Most Experienced & Successful Trial Lawyers

Boston Internet & Computer Crime Lawyer

Defense Against Cyber Crime Accusations

In today's digital age, many people have access to computers, the internet, or both. While these devices and services allow us to conduct legitimate transactions with one another, some people use them to commit criminal offenses. With the complexities of networks and the ability for individuals to remain anonymous online, you might find yourself entangled in a computer or internet scheme. If you're being investigated for an offense, you could face harsh conviction penalties, such as years in federal prison and substantial fines.

When you're facing serious charges, it's imperative to get a serious lawyer on your side. At Martin G. Weinberg, Attorney at Law that is the type of legal representation we provide. Backed by extensive experience in the criminal justice system, which includes representing individuals in federal court, we know what it takes to mount an effective defense and adeptly guide individuals through the process. Our attorney will work tirelessly on your behalf and will be a staunch legal advocate prepared to challenge even the toughest charges and opponents.

Learn more about how we can help you by calling us at (617) 227-3700 today.

What Constitutes a Computer Crime?

The offenses that could be considered computer crimes are many.

Federal law defines the following as computer-related prohibited behaviors:

  • Knowingly accessing and obtaining confidential national data
  • Intentionally accessing a computer to gather financial information
  • Intentionally accessing a computer owned by a U.S. government department or agency
  • Accesses a computer with the intent to defraud
  • Accessing a computer with the intent to commit extortion

Depending on the type of offense and the defendant’s criminal history, a conviction for a computer crime could result in up to 20 years in federal prison.

What's Considered an Internet Crime?

An internet crime is different from a computer crime in that the former is committed across online networks. Because these matters have grown considerably in recent years, the FBI aggressively investigates them. The agency has set up specific units focused solely on identifying individuals suspected to be involved in these types of offenses.

Types of internet crimes identified by the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center include, but are not limited to:

  • Generally, after a natural disaster, posing as a charity to solicit donations from others
  • Developing a false trust or romantic relationship with someone to get them to send money, personal information, or other items of value
  • Copying or transmitting sensitive information from a corporation for unauthorized use
  • Obtaining credit card information of others to purchase goods and/or services
  • Exploiting children
  • Using intimidation to extract money from others
  • Engaging in online gambling or betting
  • Taking personal identifying information of others
  • Decrypting data on a protected computer and demanding payment for the encryption key

Schedule Your consultation Today

Have you been charged with a computer or internet crime? Reach out to Martin G. Weinberg, Attorney at Law to get aggressive defense from our highly experienced Boston lawyer. The criminal process can be frightening and stressful, which is why we will be by your side every step of the way. We'll thoroughly answer all your questions, explain the charges you're facing, and inform you of your legal options.

We offer in-person or phone consultations. Call us at (617) 227-3700 or submit an online contact form to speak with our attorney.

  • The Best Lawyers in America
  • Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register of Pre-eminent Lawyers
  • Lawyers Assistance Strike Force
  • United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • Guest lecturer at Harvard Law School
  • Best Law Firms for Criminal Defense: White-Collar in Boston, MA
  • Top 10 Attorneys in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • AV Preeminent® Rating from Martindale-Hubbell®
  • Super Lawyers®

Highly Revered & Recommended

  • “One of the deans of the criminal defense bar!”

    - David O. Markus
  • “Among the nation’s best defense lawyers.”

    - Miami Herald
  • “A nationally prominent criminal defense lawyer.”

    - Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Contact Us Today

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.

Significant Cases

  • Successful Challenge US v Warshak

    631 F3d 266 CA 6 (2010): Successful challenge to the Department of Justice’s reliance on the Stored Communications Act to seize the content of emails in violation of the Fourth Amendment

  • Reversal of Conviction US v Bravo Fernandez

    (722 F3d 1, 1st Cir, 2013): Federal Court of Appeals reversed conviction of a leading businessman in Puerto Rico for federal programs bribery holding that gratuities cannot, legally, be the basis for such a conviction.

  • Vacated Sanction US v Agosto-Vega

    (1st Cir, 9-27-13): Federal Court of Appeals vacated a monetary sanction imposed against a criminal defense attorney holding that there was no legal or factual basis for the imposition of the sanction.

  • Vacated Conviction US v Urciuoli

    513 F3d 290 CA 1 (2008): Vacating of honest services conviction as a result of instructions that impermissibly broadened the “official act” element of 18 USC 1346.

  • New Trial Motion US v Carpenter
  • Habeas Corpus Relief Ferrara v US

    456 F3d 278 CA 1 (2006): Affirming trial court’s granting of habeas corpus relief to a RICO defendant whose decision to plead guilty to murder predicates was found to be involuntary due to prosecutor’s concealment of core exculpatory evidence.

  • Appeal of Conviction US v Stewart

    433 F3d 273 CA 2 (2006): Co-counsel in appeal of conviction of Martha Stewart for making false statements and obstructing an SEC investigation.

  • Reversal of Conviction US v Carucci

    364 F3d 339 CA 1 (2004): Reversal of money laundering convictions following split jury verdict in prosecution of Boston real estate developer

  • Non-Contempt US v Kouri-Perez

    187 F3d 1 CA 1 (1999): Representation of attorneys charged with non-contempt civil sanctions.

  • Vacated Sentence US v Grandmaison