Political Corruption Work With One of the Nation's Most Experienced & Successful Trial Lawyers

Boston Political Corruption Attorney

How is a "Political Corruption Crime" Distinguished From Other Types of Crimes

If you are being investigated for or have been accused of committing a political corruption crime, it's imperative to speak with an attorney right away to get started on your defense. Because these matters can affect people's lives, the way judicial processes are carried out, or even impact the construction of schools, they are taken very seriously. The FBI, often working in conjunction with state and local law enforcement agencies, extensively investigates individuals suspected of an offense. The sooner you retain legal services, the sooner you can begin fighting your charges.

When looking for an attorney to represent you in a political crime case, it's important to hire one who knows the federal judicial processes. At Martin G. Weinberg, Attorney at Law, that's exactly what you'll get. Our Boston white collar crime lawyer has over 40 years of legal experience and has handled cases in federal district courts and the U.S. Supreme court. We will be committed to protecting your rights and challenging the government's accusations against you.

We are ready to begin developing a sound defense on your behalf. For a consultation, call us at (617) 227-3700 today.

Types of Political Corruption Charges in Massachusetts

Political corruption occurs when a person in a public or government role uses their power for their own personal gain or acts in a way that erodes the public's trust in the system. Because there are various types of political roles and the individuals in these positions have contact with several different people, a political corruption offense could occur in many ways. For instance, if a federal prison official accepts bribes to smuggle drugs into a prison, they could be charged with a crime.

A few other types of political corruption charges include:

  • Misappropriation of funds: Using someone else’s funds in an unintended way, usually for one’s own gain.
  • Bribery: Accepting something of value from someone who wishes to influence their decision making.
  • Cronyism: A public official appointing or advocating for the employment of a relative to a civilian position within the agency they serve or has jurisdiction over.
  • Campaign finance violation: Accepting or receiving financial contributions above legally allowed limits or filing false disclosure forms to the Federal Election Commission.
  • Extortion: Using power as an official to force someone to provide money or favors.
  • Abuse of power: Using one’s power in a political role for personal benefit.

What Are the Penalties for a Political Corruption Conviction?

The conviction penalties for a political corruption crime vary depending on the type of offense and the specifics of the circumstances. If you're found guilty, you could be looking at spending years in federal prison and/or paying a substantial amount in fines.

The laws regarding what a public official can and cannot do are complex, and you may have engaged in behavior that you believed was lawful and are now facing a political corruption charges. This can be a stressful experience, as such accusations can ruin reputations, and a conviction could mean the loss of a public or government position. At Martin G. Weinberg, Attorney at Law, our Boston lawyer will help you understand your charges, potential outcomes, and your legal options. We will be a strong and loyal advocate in your corner throughout the process.

Trust your case to us. Call (617) 227-3700 or submit an online contact form.

  • The Best Lawyers in America
  • Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register of Pre-eminent Lawyers
  • Lawyers Assistance Strike Force
  • United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • Guest lecturer at Harvard Law School
  • Best Law Firms for Criminal Defense: White-Collar in Boston, MA
  • Top 10 Attorneys in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • AV Preeminent® Rating from Martindale-Hubbell®
  • Super Lawyers®
/

Highly Revered & Recommended

  • “One of the deans of the criminal defense bar!”

    - David O. Markus
  • “Among the nation’s best defense lawyers.”

    - Miami Herald
  • “A nationally prominent criminal defense lawyer.”

    - Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Contact Us Today

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.

Significant Cases

  • Successful Challenge US v Warshak

    631 F3d 266 CA 6 (2010): Successful challenge to the Department of Justice’s reliance on the Stored Communications Act to seize the content of emails in violation of the Fourth Amendment

  • Reversal of Conviction US v Bravo Fernandez

    (722 F3d 1, 1st Cir, 2013): Federal Court of Appeals reversed conviction of a leading businessman in Puerto Rico for federal programs bribery holding that gratuities cannot, legally, be the basis for such a conviction.

  • Vacated Sanction US v Agosto-Vega

    (1st Cir, 9-27-13): Federal Court of Appeals vacated a monetary sanction imposed against a criminal defense attorney holding that there was no legal or factual basis for the imposition of the sanction.

  • Vacated Conviction US v Urciuoli

    513 F3d 290 CA 1 (2008): Vacating of honest services conviction as a result of instructions that impermissibly broadened the “official act” element of 18 USC 1346.

  • New Trial Motion US v Carpenter
  • Habeas Corpus Relief Ferrara v US

    456 F3d 278 CA 1 (2006): Affirming trial court’s granting of habeas corpus relief to a RICO defendant whose decision to plead guilty to murder predicates was found to be involuntary due to prosecutor’s concealment of core exculpatory evidence.

  • Appeal of Conviction US v Stewart

    433 F3d 273 CA 2 (2006): Co-counsel in appeal of conviction of Martha Stewart for making false statements and obstructing an SEC investigation.

  • Reversal of Conviction US v Carucci

    364 F3d 339 CA 1 (2004): Reversal of money laundering convictions following split jury verdict in prosecution of Boston real estate developer

  • Non-Contempt US v Kouri-Perez

    187 F3d 1 CA 1 (1999): Representation of attorneys charged with non-contempt civil sanctions.

  • Vacated Sentence US v Grandmaison
/