Racketeering Work With One of the Nation's Most Experienced & Successful Trial Lawyers

Boston Racketeering Attorney

Massachusetts Racketeering Charges

Have you been charged with a racketeering offense? This is not something that should be taken lightly. Because the activities of such crimes can harm legitimate businesses and/or individuals, the federal government thoroughly investigates, hotly prosecutes, and harshly punishes these matters. If you're found guilty, your rights and freedoms are at stake, as a conviction results in up to 20 years to life in prison and hefty fines. On top of that, any property you obtained from the alleged activity will be forfeit.

If you're being investigated or have been charged with a racketeering crime, one of the most important things you can do is discuss your case with an attorney with an extensive understanding of federal laws and judicial processes. Backed by over 4 decades of legal experience, and having represented clients in over 20 federal district courts, our lawyer at Martin G. Weinberg, Attorney at Law can provide the skilled legal representation you need. We understand the seriousness of your charges, which is why we will work relentlessly to challenge the accusations made against you and work toward a favorable outcome on your behalf. When you retain our services, you will have a loyal and aggressive advocate going up against the government for you.

If you're ready to discuss your case and legal options, call us at (617) 227-3700 for a consultation.

What Are the 35 Crimes of Racketeering?

Racketeering comes from the term "racket," which means to use deceit, intimidation, or coercion to force money from others. Typically, in a racketeering scheme, the alleged racketeer will create a problem that the victim must pay to fix. A relatively recent and rapidly growing offense is cyber extortion. This occurs when a person or group of people decrypt the data on a protected computer, which stops the user from accessing their files or information. The attacker then demands that the user pay a ransom for the encryption key. Racketeering doesn't just refer to a single crime or one instance of an offense.

Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, 35 different offenses could be charged as racketeering, which include:

  • Murder
  • Kidnapping
  • Arson
  • Robbery
  • Bribery
  • Extortion

Although RICO was established to pursue instances of organized crime, in recent years, it has been used to go after individuals and even corporations. Again, a person may be charged with racketeering if they engage in a "pattern of activity." This means that they can be pursued under RICO if they were involved in two racketeering acts, with the second one happening within 10 years of the first.

Martin G. Weinberg, Attorney at Law Racketeering Legal Counsel

With your reputation and future at stake, and the federal government prosecuting the matter, trying to handle your racketeering case on your own or with the help of an inexperienced lawyer could prove costly. At Martin G. Weinberg, Attorney at Law, our Boston white collar defense lawyer is here to provide high-quality representation. We have the knowledge, skills, and legal acumen to effectively build a defense strategy on your behalf and challenge the accusations made against you.

Schedule your consultation today by calling us at (617) 227-3700 or contacting us online.

  • The Best Lawyers in America
  • Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register of Pre-eminent Lawyers
  • Lawyers Assistance Strike Force
  • United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • Guest lecturer at Harvard Law School
  • Best Law Firms for Criminal Defense: White-Collar in Boston, MA
  • Top 10 Attorneys in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • AV Preeminent® Rating from Martindale-Hubbell®
  • Super Lawyers®

Highly Revered & Recommended

  • “One of the deans of the criminal defense bar!”

    - David O. Markus
  • “Among the nation’s best defense lawyers.”

    - Miami Herald
  • “A nationally prominent criminal defense lawyer.”

    - Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Contact Us Today

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.

Significant Cases

  • Successful Challenge US v Warshak

    631 F3d 266 CA 6 (2010): Successful challenge to the Department of Justice’s reliance on the Stored Communications Act to seize the content of emails in violation of the Fourth Amendment

  • Reversal of Conviction US v Bravo Fernandez

    (722 F3d 1, 1st Cir, 2013): Federal Court of Appeals reversed conviction of a leading businessman in Puerto Rico for federal programs bribery holding that gratuities cannot, legally, be the basis for such a conviction.

  • Vacated Sanction US v Agosto-Vega

    (1st Cir, 9-27-13): Federal Court of Appeals vacated a monetary sanction imposed against a criminal defense attorney holding that there was no legal or factual basis for the imposition of the sanction.

  • Vacated Conviction US v Urciuoli

    513 F3d 290 CA 1 (2008): Vacating of honest services conviction as a result of instructions that impermissibly broadened the “official act” element of 18 USC 1346.

  • New Trial Motion US v Carpenter
  • Habeas Corpus Relief Ferrara v US

    456 F3d 278 CA 1 (2006): Affirming trial court’s granting of habeas corpus relief to a RICO defendant whose decision to plead guilty to murder predicates was found to be involuntary due to prosecutor’s concealment of core exculpatory evidence.

  • Appeal of Conviction US v Stewart

    433 F3d 273 CA 2 (2006): Co-counsel in appeal of conviction of Martha Stewart for making false statements and obstructing an SEC investigation.

  • Reversal of Conviction US v Carucci

    364 F3d 339 CA 1 (2004): Reversal of money laundering convictions following split jury verdict in prosecution of Boston real estate developer

  • Non-Contempt US v Kouri-Perez

    187 F3d 1 CA 1 (1999): Representation of attorneys charged with non-contempt civil sanctions.

  • Vacated Sentence US v Grandmaison